From: How effective are protected areas for reducing threats to biodiversity? A systematic review protocol
Section | Content |
---|---|
Metadata | Authors & Publication year, title, publication type, journal, DOI, scale (e.g., Local, regional, global), ecosystem type, threat assessment method, does the study include a control? What variables are considered? Taxonomic group(s) studied, methods, reported threats, data location within article, comments |
Information relating to the inclusion criteria | (a) Population: Reported threats IUCN Threat Classification Scheme V3.3, proxies of threats |
(b) Intervention: PA(s) characteristics: Name (if individual PA reported), number of PAs (When multiple PAs has been assessed, study area or country, year of establishment, management type, additional information | |
(c) Comparator: Assessment period, study type, study using control variables? Comparison type of the study (e.g. Time, control variable, management type?) | |
(d) Outcome: Threat level assessment after control and/or comparison (Value, effect, and in comparative analysis: Was the PA more effective than the control? effect of PA on overall threats (Positive, neutral, negative), identified factors leading the threat change, additional data (and additional comments | |
Additional calculations | To be defined according to the findings. Initially, results will be reported as the percentage of effectiveness of the PA/threat control strategies to change the threat state over time (Value and effect tabs) (Positive and negative values refer to positive and negative effects, respectively) |