Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of 16 studies investigating socio-economic impact of activities in UNESCO BRs in Southeast Asia

From: What are the impacts of activities undertaken in UNESCO biosphere reserves on socio-economic wellbeing in Southeast Asia? A systematic review

Article; type of data

UNESCO BR, Country

Study design

Population

Intervention category and duration of intervention

Outcome category

Data collection method

Internal validity rating

Bahadur, 2020

Quantitative

Tonle Sap, Cambodia

Non-controlled, (cross-sectional)

Households dependent on fish

CBNRM

3 years

Economic living standards

Governance

Social relations

Subjective well-being

Material living standards

Survey

High

D'Agnes, 2010

Quantitative and Qualitative

Palawan, Philippines

BA

Household in Palawan

CBNRM

Health intervention

CBNRM & Health intervention

At least 4 years

Health

Economic living standards

Household survey (not matched pre-post, they were different, deliberately)

High

Dinh, 2010

Quantitative

Cat Tien (Dong Nai), Vietnam

CI

BACI

Household in biosphere reserve

Resource Use Management

4 years

Economic living standards

Household surveys

Low

Dumlao, 2003

Quantitative and Qualitative

Palawan, Philippines

CI

Coastal community

Habitat management

1996 (across 6 years)

Economic living standards

Social relations

Interview with structured questions

Moderate

Eriksson, 2019

Quantitative and Qualitative

Komodo MPA, Indonesia

CI

Residents

Resource Use Management

Since 1980 (BR)

Since 2010 in (outside BR)

Economic living standards

Education

Social relations

Semi-structured interviews

Moderate

Ngoc, 2018

Quantitative

Cu Lao Cham, Vietnam

Non-controlled, (cross-sectional)

Longline fishers

Gillnet fishers

Liftnet fishers

Fishing households

Resource Use Management

10 years

Economic living standards

Material living standards

Economic living standards

Governance

Survey

Unclear

Nguyen, 2019

Quantitative and Qualitative

Cu Lao Cham, Vietnam

Non-controlled, (cross-sectional)

Local people working in tourism sector

Livelihood intervention

NR

Social relations

Subjective well-being

Economic living standards

Interviews

Low

Palmer, 2014

Quantitative and Qualitative

Lore Lindu, Indonesia

Non-controlled, (cross-sectional)

Communities in 3 areas impacted by NGOs

CBNRM years

14 years approx

Governance

Community surveys

Moderate

Pido, 2009

Quantitative

Palawan, Philippines

Non-controlled, (cross-sectional)

Local residents

CBNRM

6 years maximum

Material living standards

Individual and household interviews

Low

Richardson, 2018

Quantitative and Qualitative

Tonle Sap, Cambodia

CI

Fish farming/former fish farming households

Livelihood intervention

4 years

Material living standards

Household survey

Moderate

Shively, 2001

Quantitative

Palawan, Philippines

CI

BA

Community (farming)

Livelihood intervention

NR

Economic living standards

Survey

Unclear

Sok, 2012

Quantitative

Tonle Sap, Cambodia

Non-controlled, (cross-sectional)

Households

CBNRM

8 years approx

Social relations

Survey

Moderate

Torell, 2010

Quantitative

Ranong, Thailand

CI

Non-controlled, (cross-sectional)

Households

Livelihood intervention

NR

Economic living standards

Social relations

Governance

Education

Survey

High

Tran, 2014

Quantitative and Qualitative

Red River Delta, Vietnam

CI

Local residents participating in scheme

Livelihood intervention

2006–2011 (funded)

Economic living standards

Survey

Moderate

Tupper, 2015

Quantitative and Qualitative

Palawan, Philippines

Non-controlled, (cross-sectional)

Stakeholders for the Calamianes islands MPA

Resource Use Management

2–4 years, depending on the MPA site

Governance

Economic living standards

Workshop on perceptions

Moderate

Vong, 2017

Quantitative and Qualitative

Tonle Sap, Cambodia

CI

Households

CBNRM

9 years

Material living standards

Household interview, semi-structured questionnaire

Moderate

  1. BA before–after; CI control-impact, CBNRM community-based natural resource management, MPA marine protected area, NGO non-governmental organization, NR  not reported