Skip to main content

Box 2 Study internal validity assessment

From: What are the impacts of activities undertaken in UNESCO biosphere reserves on socio-economic wellbeing in Southeast Asia? A systematic review

Internal validity criteria

Type of bias addressed

Was the study free of any baseline factors that may be associated with both the intervention and outcome of interest (or different participant groups if non-comparative)?

Confounders at baseline/selection bias

Was the study free of any external events or factors during the study that could influence the outcome of interest?

Confounding

Were the intervention (and comparator, if present) clearly defined, at an appropriate temporal and spatial scale, and adhered to as intended?

Appropriate intervention/comparator

Was an appropriate method used to measure the outcome across all study groups?

Detection bias

Were all data reported, or was the study clear of any systematic differences between study groups in the number of missing data?

Attrition bias

Were all outcome measurements reported appropriately?

Outcome reporting bias