Article validity | Intervention description | Comparator used | Outcome description | Summary of relevant results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bahadur, 2020 High | Community fishing policy, abolition of lots | n/a | Households dependent on fish: % decreased/increased/same Profit from fishing Conflict with law enforcement Conflict with other fishers Fear of getting into trouble Happiness | After 3 years of fishing legislation in Tonle Sap: Profit made from fishing did not change significantly (46.5/38.2/15.35%; n 484) Conflict with law enforcement has decreased (77.4/7.9/14.7%; n 469) Conflict with other fishers significantly decreased p < 0.1 (78.1/5.1/16.8%; n 489) Fear of getting into trouble significantly decreased p < 0.05 (49.3/28.6/22.1%; n 465) People's general happiness improved (20.1/35.1/44.8%; n 467) |
% yes/no Access to fish better? % yes/no Livelihood income better? % yes/no | Access to fish improved significantly p < 0.05 (75/25%; n 428) Livelihood and income did not change significantly (47.9/52.1% n 422) | |||
D'Agnes, 2010 High | CBNRM: marine/mangrove protected areas, reforestation, enforcement, peer education and behaviour change communication; prohibiting dynamite and cyanide use in fishing RH: family planning, non-clinical contraceptives, peer education and behaviour change communication, improved access to RH services CBNRM + RH integrated as one package | Before CBNRM Before RH Before CBNRM + RH | Proportion of households 4 years after intervention: Youth contraceptive use at first sexual experience | Youth contraceptive use at first sexual experience (n = 400 each intervention): No sig difference after CBNRM intervention No sig difference after RH intervention Sig increase after CBNRM + RH intervention |
Before CBNRM Before RH Before CBNRM + RH | Young (15–24) males sexually active | Proportion of young males sexually active (n = 400 each intervention): No sig difference after CBNRM intervention No sig difference after RH intervention Sig decrease after CBNRM + RH intervention | ||
Before CBNRM Before RH Before CBNRM + RH | Households dependent on fishing | Proportion of households dependent on fishing (n = 400 each intervention): No sig difference after CBNRM intervention No sig difference after RH intervention Sig decrease after CBNRM + RH intervention | ||
Dinh, 2010 Low | Core zone, ban on exploitation Buffer zone Transition zone | n/a | % change in gross annual income from forest per capita between 1998 and 2005 | Change in % gross annual income from forest per occupant between 1998 and 2005 was highest in core (83%) compared to buffer (27%) and transition (3%) and shows local people kept using forest resources despite ban in Core zone, Cat Tien 1998–2005. n for the three zones was 18; 51; 18 respectively |
After designation: Core zone Buffer zone Transition zone | Before designation: Core zone Buffer zone Transition zone | Gross annual income from forest—1000 Vietnamese Dong/occupant/year | Gross annual income from the forest was similar across zones (though higher in core than buffer and transition, 1840 vs 1570 vs 1470) before 1998 designation of Cat Tien BR. By 2005, it had increased sevenfold in core, threefold in buffer and slightly increased in the transition (12,580 vs 4540 vs 1760). n for the three zones was 18; 51; 18 respectively | |
After designation: Core zone Buffer zone Transition zone | Before designation: Core zone Buffer zone Transition zone | % of household income from forest resources | 1998–2005 the % of income from forest increased most in core zone (from 67 to 97%, t = − 5.212, df 17, p < 0.001), then in buffer (from 58 to 64%, t = − 2.031, df 50, p < 0.05), while it dropped in transition zone (from 45 to 19%, NS). n for the three zones was 18; 51; 18 respectively | |
Dumlao, 2003 Moderate | Mangrove rehabilitation project | Non members of the mangrove rehabilitation project | % local people reporting: Increased family income | Comparing perspectives of members of a 6-year mangrove rehabilitation project and local non-members (n = 15 in each group): 73% of members had uplift in family income through financial support by the project, whilst none of the non-members did. However, 23% of members said their income had decreased due to mangrove planting (e.g. time spent planting has low monetary return) |
Tensions in local social relations | All respondents in both groups experienced project-related social tensions e.g. (misunderstandings, boundary and area conflicts and lack of cooperation). This is likely due to/exacerbated by project implementers not providing solutions or guidance for these problems | |||
Eriksson, 2019 Moderate | Shark and manta ray conservation—fishing zone restrictions, fishing gear restrictions | Non-BR with intervention | Effect of conservation on economic income % increase/decrease/no mention | Comparing Komodo National Park in BR (n = 30) and Nusa Penida outside BR (n = 14): Komodo, 63% of the 30 respondents experienced a negative effect on income from Park (10% increase in income, 27% did not mention): the zoning system complicated access to fishing grounds, and they had to invest in new fishing gear Nusa Penida: 43% of 14 respondents had increased income and none experienced a negative effect (57% did not mention). Many said livelihoods depend on the region being protected, especially those working part-time in tourism |
Knowledge of conservation rules % responding high/low/no mention | Komodo: 43% had a high degree of knowledge of conservation rules and 40% a low degree (17% did not mention). Also many complained of poor access to information about regulations Nusa Penida: 72% had a high degree of this knowledge, 14% a low degree and 14% did not mention | |||
Relationship with conservation authorities % responding good/bad/no mention | Komodo: relations between fishing communities and conservation authorities and rangers were poor according to 67%, only 20% mentioned good relations, 13% did not mention. Some said park rangers were threatening. Lack of dialogue for the zoning system led to past disputes Nusa Penida: a majority had good opinion of MPA management and boat patrols (86%), seeing them as friendly, respectful, and trustworthy. They said fishing had improved since protection from destructive fishing gear. None said there was a bad relationship, 14% did not mention | |||
Access to alternative livelihoods % responding good/poor/no mention | Komodo: only 23% had access to alternative livelihoods, most said access was poor (67%), 10% did not mention. The main obstacle being a lack of access to financial support to start businesses such as shops or street kitchens Nusa Penida: access to additional source of income was perceived as good (64%) especially tourism which was used by half of interviewees. None described it as poor, and 36% did not mention | |||
Ngoc, 2018 Unclear | Core zone, with fishing ban | n/a | Litres extra fuel usage per trip | Since the MPA ban on fishing, across 135 fishers, more litres of fuel were used to access fishing grounds: liftnet fishers worst affected, then longline, then gillnet (x̄ 4.2 L per trip vs 3.8 and 1.1) |
MPA | Fishing households' (Likert scale 1–5) perceived impact of MPA on: Food security Tourism jobs and additional income Participate in creating/managing MPA regulation | Across 135 fishers, perceived impact of MPA after 10 years' implementation in Cu Lao Cham: Food security: mean closest to "somewhat agree" (x̄ 3.95) Tourism jobs and extra income: closest to "somewhat agree" (x̄ 3.79) Participate in MPA regulation: between "somewhat disagree" and "neither agree nor disagree" (x̄ 2.6) | ||
Nguyen, 2019 Low | Initiatives to aid local people participation in tourism services: Training courses for local guides and motorbike taxi groups | n/a | % tourism workers reporting conflict: Between local stakeholders and tour operators Between freelance guides and tour guides Among local tourism stakeholders | Of 41 local respondents working in tourism in Cu Lao Cham, regarding tourism and initiatives by CLC Tourism Management board: 29% said it caused social conflicts between local tourism stakeholders and tour operators, 10% said it caused conflict between freelance guides and tour guides, and 12% said it cause conflict among local tourism stakeholders |
Perceived quality of life % improved a lot/improved a little/no change | 68% perceived it improved quality of life a lot, 15% improved a little, and 17% no change | |||
% reporting jobs provided: for poor/for women | 90% said tourism provided jobs for the poor, and 90% said it provided jobs for women | |||
Palmer, 2014 Moderate | NGOs supporting indigenous rights to resource extraction | n/a | Participated in negotiation, YTM/YJ site, mean of responses (1 = yes, 0 = no): All household heads Some household heads | In Lore Lindu, after 14 years of NGO support for indigenous rights by YTM/YJ, negotiations for comanagement involved: Low participation of ALL household heads (x̄ 0.29, SD 0.46, n 7) Moderate participation of SOME household heads (x̄ 0.62, SD 0.50, n 7) |
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) focus on biodiversity conservation | n/a | Participated in negotiation, TNC site, mean of responses (1 = yes, 0 = no): All household heads Some household heads | In Lore Lindu, after 14 years of NGO support for indigenous rights by TNC site, negotiations for comanagement involved: No participation of ALL household heads (x̄ 0, n 21) High participation of SOME household heads (x̄ 0.86 SD 0.38, n 21) | |
Pido, 2009 Low | Locally managed MPA | n/a | % low/middle/high Material lifestyle local house construction materials | For 135 households within MPA in Palawan, using household building materials as a proxy, material style of life measures were: low 30.4%; middle 36.3%; and high 33.3% |
Richardson, 2018 Moderatre | Small-scale aquaculture pond management program (Cambodia HARVEST Aquaculture and Fisheries Program) | No intervention (people who discontinued) | % fish-farming households that sometimes cannot afford to feed family | In household survey at Tonle Sap lake in 2015, locals who continued on aquaculture program (n = 324) had fewer problems feeding their families than those who discontinued, n = 112, (23% vs 40%) but the difference was not significant (z score = 1.381 p = 0.1673) |
Shively, 2001 Unclear | Farms on biosphere reserve with irrigation | Biosphere reserve site with no irrigation | Total income (Pesos) of farm household | A significant difference (only at the 90% level) in income between irrigated (x̄ 104,128; n 46) and rain-fed (x̄ 108,867; n 35) lowland rice farms in Palawan |
Irrigation | Before irrigation | Days of employment for farm labourers | More days of employment available on upland farms after irrigation systems added than before (x̄ 44 vs 18, n unknown), but not significant at 95% level. Unknown duration of irrigation | |
Sok, 2012 Moderate | Community fishing project | n/a | Participation in fisheries project (% women/men): community meetings group discussions workshops | Across 301 respondents, for a fisheries project, there was significantly different participation in: community meetings: odds ratio of 3.8 at p < 0.05 (46.3/75.2%) group discussions: odds ratio of > 3.5 at p < 0.05 (38.4/67.9%) workshops: odds ratio of 2.1, at p < 0.05 (48.8/64.2%) Other activities not significantly different between men and women included training, cross visits, whiteboard information, bulletins, advocacy campaigns, and commune investment plan development |
Torell, 2010 High | Micro-credit and new enterprises to diversify livelihoods by resource management and small scale infrastructure in five communities severely affected by 2004 tsunami | Non project beneficiaries | Number of livelihoods per household | Household survey of micro-credit intervention in Thailand: Number of livelihoods per household showed no significant difference between beneficiaries (x̄ 1.92; SD 0.932; n 226) and non-beneficiaries (x̄ 2.04; SD 0.979; n 228); t = 1.328, df = 452, p > 0.1 |
n/a | Household response for: Create stronger social ties Improve coordination with local government Develop my business skills | % of micro-credit beneficiaries (n = 226) who chose 4 ("agree") on Likert scale 1–5 for: Creating stronger social ties: 73% Improving coordination with local governments: 51% Developing business skills: 67% | ||
Tran, 2014 Moderate | Giao Xuan ecotourism project with hosting to develop the skills of community members (especially poor women and fishermen) in conservation-based eco-business | Non-host families within the ecotourism project | USD monthly income of resident families participating in scheme | In a capacity building ecotourism project over 5 years with 11 host families involved in the project, ecotourism income $47 per month, twice the average for non-hosting project members (n = unclear, possibly 6). The hosts' ecotourism income was twice as much as from wet rice cultivation |
Tupper, 2015 Moderate | Sagrada-Bogtong Marine Reserve Decalve Strict Protection Zone (Bintuan-Sangat Marine Park) Bugor-Sand Island MPA | n/a | MPA stakeholders' ratings of: "Existence of a decision-making & management body" "Existence and adequacy of enabling legislation" "Degree of interaction between managers & stakeholders" | Household survey of 28 Calamianes Islands MPA stakeholders: Across all three sites, adequacy of decision-making & management body, and enabling legislation, and interaction between managers and stakeholders, were positive except for the last which was negative only in Sagrada-Bogtong, |
Sagrada-Bogtong Marine Reserve Decalve Strict Protection Zone (Bintuan-Sangat Marine Park) Bugor-Sand Island MPA | "Perceptions of local resource harvest" "Number and nature of markets" | Across all three sites, perceptions of local resource harvest were negative, e, and perceptions of the number and nature of markets were positive | ||
Vong, 2017 Moderate | CBNRM in Chivieng | No CBNRM | Household expenditure USD on food, non-food and non-timber forest products | Even though CBNRM did not positively affect the household consumption in Chivieng community as a whole (possibly due to the impact of migrant fishers), in the CBNRM community, households who fished only inside the community boundary, had higher household consumption than those fishing within boundary in the non CBNRM community (x̄ = 56.4 Range (15.57–138); n 156 vs x̄ = 33.95 (12.51–110); n 192, NS |