Skip to main content

Table 2 Rating system used for assessing evidence for restoration effectiveness

From: Have wet meadow restoration projects in the Southwestern U.S. been effective in restoring geomorphology, hydrology, soils, and plant species composition?

Assessment of evidence presented

Rating

Characteristic not mentioned

N/A

Characteristic mentioned; evidence presented to demonstrate failure

0

Characteristic mentioned; no evidence presented to demonstrate success

1

Characteristic mentioned; insufficient evidence presented to demonstrate success

2

Characteristic mentioned; sufficient evidence presented to demonstrate partial success

3

Characteristic mentioned; sufficient evidence presented to demonstrate full success

4

  1. “Characteristic” refers to those listed in Table 1; “mentioned” refers to whether or not the characteristic was listed as specific goal of the restoration project.
Back to article page

Environmental Evidence

ISSN: 2047-2382