Table 1 Elements of the systematic review question
From: Does the effectiveness of forest protected areas differ conditionally on their type of governance?
Setting | Perspective | Interest, phenomena of | Comparison | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Forest protected areas | 1. Local Community | 1. Governmental PAs | 1. With different governance regimes | 1) Attitudinal success measured through (difference/change in) attitudes of local stakeholders towards focal PA, authority and/or management practices |
2. PA Authority/Management staff | 2. Co-managed PAs | |||
| Â | 3. Private PAs | 2) Behavioural success measured through (difference/change in) level of conservation-oriented behaviour necessary to decrease the threats to natural resources | ||
4. Community conserved areas | ||||
5. Hybrid forms | 3) Ecological success measured through (difference/change in) deforestation rate, biodiversity level, maintenance of forest cover and forest density, condition, health, etc | |||
4) Spillover effects: social, institutional and ecological changes in surrounding social-ecological systems |