|
Variable name
|
Cohen’s Kappa
|
|---|
|
Project impetus
|
0.49
|
|
Establishment
|
0.47
|
|
Decision-making
|
0.61
|
|
Approach local culture
|
0.84
|
|
Approach local institutions
|
0.58
|
|
Resource use
|
−0.14
|
|
Economic benefits
|
0.10
|
|
Equitable distribution
|
0.32
|
|
Elite capture
|
0.25
|
|
Capacity skills
|
0.18
|
|
Capacity institutions
|
0.08
|
|
Social capital
|
0.24
|
|
Environmental education
|
0.26
|
|
Market integration
|
0.13
|
|
Supportive local culture
|
0.32
|
|
Effective local government
|
0.46
|
|
Tenure
|
0.35
|
|
Charisma
|
−0.09
|
|
Population size
|
0.78
|
|
Population heterogeneity
|
0.62
|
|
Attitudinal outcomes
|
0.66
|
|
Behavioral outcomes
|
0.56
|
|
Ecological outcomes
|
0.67
|
|
Economic outcomes
|
0.52
|
- Kappa values greater than 0.40 indicate moderate agreement, greater than 0.60 indicate substantial agreement, and greater than 0.80 indicate almost perfect agreement
[89]. Negative values close to zero indicate that the disagreement between researchers and authors was likely due to chance, while larger negative values suggest that researchers and authors had a different perception of how to code for that variable. Note that not all variables were included in the questionnaire for authors.
