Assessing community-based conservation projects: A systematic review and multilevel analysis of attitudinal, behavioral, ecological, and economic outcomes

Table 9 Coefficients from bivariate proportional odds logistic regression (continuous variables) and Goodman Kruskal gamma values from two-way contingency tables (categorical variables)

	Variable name	Attitudinal success	Behavioral success	Ecological success	Economic success
NC1	Governance		2.42
NC1	Rights
NC2	HDI	2.56	2.35
NC2	Gini	1.94
PD1	Impetus		0.36	0.68
PD1	Establishment	0.41	0.38	0.47
PD1	Decision-making	0.34	0.38	0.38	0.42
PD1	Approach local culture	0.55	0.56	0.70	0.56
PD1	Approach local institutions	0.46	0.63	0.81	0.45
PD2	Protectionism			0.45
PD2	Resource use
PD3	Economic benefits
PD3	Equitable distribution	0.47	0.58	0.56
PD3	Elite capture	0.62	0.60	0.44	0.45
PD4	Capacity skills	0.42	0.53	0.60	0.50
PD4	Capacity institutions	0.63	0.57	0.69	0.48
PD4	Social capital	0.78	0.63	0.50	0.53
PD4	Environmental education	0.34	0.33
CC1	Market integration
CC1	Threat
CC2	Supportive local culture		0.34
CC2	Effective local government		0.47	0.59
CC2	Tenure	0.33		0.28	0.34
CC2	Charisma
CC3	Population size		0.34
CC3	Population heterogeneity
CTR	Ecoregion status
CTR	Author discipline
CTR	Years project running

Dark cells indicate a significant association between independent and dependent variables. Analyses were conducted on the dataset that included missing values (not imputed data).

ISSN: 2047-2382