Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of the weighted simple random-effects regression models for each of the four moderator variables on fish assemblage biomass effect size

From: Evaluating the biological effectiveness of fully and partially protected marine areas

All MPA case-studies included

Moderator variable

N oMPAs

Slope [95% CI]

Q M, p-val

MPA age (year)

21

0.004 [−0.007 → 0.02]

QM = 0.49, p = 0.49

Log10 (size) (km2)

20

−0.17 [−0.27 → 0.06]

QM = 9.28, p = 0.002

Log10(census area) (m2)

18

−0.26 [−0.52 → 0.004]

QM = 3.73, p = 0.05

Min. Distance (km)

18

0.05 [0.02 → 0.09]

QM = 11.59, p = 0.0007

Sensitivity analysis; habitat confounded studies excluded

Log10 (size) (km2)

18

−0.17 [−0.29 → −0.04]

QM = 6.78, p = 0.01

Log10(census area) (m2)

15

−0.24 [−0.51 → 0.03]

QM = 3.13, p = 0.08

Min. Distance (km)

15

−0.13 [−0.31 → 0.06]

QM = 1.82, p = 0.18

  1. Data under sensitivity analysis is given only for the moderator variable which showed considerable different result from when all studies were included.