Skip to main content

Table 10 Current knowledge gaps for the 16 key intervention/exposure groups for lowland peatland

From: Evaluating effects of land management on greenhouse gas fluxes and carbon balances in boreo-temperate lowland peatland systems

Intervention/exposure-vs-comparator

CH4

N2O

NEE CO2

RecoCO2

DOC

Cropped-vs-bare

2 (1)

1

0

1 (1)

0

Drained and restored-vs-undrained

0

0

1

1

0

Drained-vs-undrained

9 (4)

5 (5)

3

10 (5)

4

Dry-vs-wet

2

3

1 (1)

1 (1)

0

Extracted and restored-vs-natural

0

0

1

1

0

High intensity farmed-vs-low intensity farmed

5

6

0

2 (1)

1

Fertilised and grazed-vs-unfertilised and mown

0

1

0

0

0

Fertilised-vs-less fertilised

2 (1)

2 (4)

2

2 (1)

0

Grass-vs-forest

1

1

0

1

0

Grazed-vs-mown

3

1

0

0

0

Irrigated-vs-non-irrigated

0

1

0

0

0

Mineral soil dressed-vs-undressed peat

0

1

0

0

0

Old abandoned-vs-recently abandoned

0

0

0

(1)

0

Old afforested-vs-recently afforested

1

1

0

1

0

Poor-vs-rich

1

0

0

1

2 (1)

Restored-vs-unrestored

4

(1)

0

3 (3)

8

  1. Numbers indicate the number of studies presenting meta-analysable data for that outcome and intervention/exposure group. Bracketed numbers indicate the number of additional studies that present mean only data (i.e. no measure of variability).