Skip to main content

Table 3 Draft variables for the data extraction

From: Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes: a systematic map protocol

Variables

Details/examples

ID

Unique ID for each article

Reviewer

 

First author

 

Year

 

Full reference

 

URL

 

Publication type

E.g., journal, book chapter, conference paper, thesis, organisation report

Article access issues

E.g., none, subscription only, author only

Biome

Forest, marine or freshwater

Study country/ies

 

Study region(s)

 

Study length

Time over which study undertaken

Study description

Short description of study

Project name

 

Intervention type

List of different forest and fish conservation and resource management interventions

Primary outcome

Short description of current state

Study design type and rating

Type of study design and ratings on a five-point scale as per [48]

Method(s) of data collection

List of data collection method(s)

Sample size

Number in sample

Sample unit

E.g., individuals, households, groups

Comparator type

E.g., randomized BACI, non-randomized BACI, temporal, spatial, other

Other outcome influences

Mentions a potential effect modifier or a non-gender inequality the influenced the outcome

Bias risk type

Screening for six different types of bias risk as per [47]

Bias risk rating

Low, high or unclear

Study quality rating

Low, high or unclear (combined design and bias ratings)

Rating rationale

Summary of the reasons for the rating

Additional details

E.g., multiple outcomes studied, multiple articles in one source, multiple experiments in one article