Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Draft variables for the data extraction

From: Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes: a systematic map protocol

Variables Details/examples
ID Unique ID for each article
Reviewer  
First author  
Year  
Full reference  
URL  
Publication type E.g., journal, book chapter, conference paper, thesis, organisation report
Article access issues E.g., none, subscription only, author only
Biome Forest, marine or freshwater
Study country/ies  
Study region(s)  
Study length Time over which study undertaken
Study description Short description of study
Project name  
Intervention type List of different forest and fish conservation and resource management interventions
Primary outcome Short description of current state
Study design type and rating Type of study design and ratings on a five-point scale as per [48]
Method(s) of data collection List of data collection method(s)
Sample size Number in sample
Sample unit E.g., individuals, households, groups
Comparator type E.g., randomized BACI, non-randomized BACI, temporal, spatial, other
Other outcome influences Mentions a potential effect modifier or a non-gender inequality the influenced the outcome
Bias risk type Screening for six different types of bias risk as per [47]
Bias risk rating Low, high or unclear
Study quality rating Low, high or unclear (combined design and bias ratings)
Rating rationale Summary of the reasons for the rating
Additional details E.g., multiple outcomes studied, multiple articles in one source, multiple experiments in one article