Skip to main content

Table 3 Draft variables for the data extraction

From: Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes: a systematic map protocol

Variables Details/examples
IDUnique ID for each article
Reviewer 
First author 
Year 
Full reference 
URL 
Publication typeE.g., journal, book chapter, conference paper, thesis, organisation report
Article access issuesE.g., none, subscription only, author only
BiomeForest, marine or freshwater
Study country/ies 
Study region(s) 
Study lengthTime over which study undertaken
Study descriptionShort description of study
Project name 
Intervention typeList of different forest and fish conservation and resource management interventions
Primary outcomeShort description of current state
Study design type and ratingType of study design and ratings on a five-point scale as per [48]
Method(s) of data collectionList of data collection method(s)
Sample sizeNumber in sample
Sample unitE.g., individuals, households, groups
Comparator typeE.g., randomized BACI, non-randomized BACI, temporal, spatial, other
Other outcome influencesMentions a potential effect modifier or a non-gender inequality the influenced the outcome
Bias risk typeScreening for six different types of bias risk as per [47]
Bias risk ratingLow, high or unclear
Study quality ratingLow, high or unclear (combined design and bias ratings)
Rating rationaleSummary of the reasons for the rating
Additional detailsE.g., multiple outcomes studied, multiple articles in one source, multiple experiments in one article