Skip to main content

Table 3 Coding variables

From: Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map

IDUnique ID for each article
First author 
Full reference 
Publication typeE.g., journal, book chapter, conference paper, thesis, organisation report
Article access issuesE.g., none, subscription only, author only
BiomeForest, marine or freshwater
Study country/ies 
Study region(s) 
Study lengthTime over which study undertaken
Study descriptionShort description of study
Project name 
Intervention type (primary)List of different forest and fish conservation and resource management interventions
Primary outcome (governance, conservation)Short description of the primary outcome
Quantitative study design rating and typeRating and type of study design on the five-point scale of the Maryland scientific methods scale
Qualitative study quality ratingRating from 1 to 10 based on CASP qualitative research checklist
Method(s) of data collectionList of data collection method(s)
Sample sizeNumber in sample
Sample unitE.g., individuals, households, groups
Comparator typeE.g., randomised before–after, control-impact (BACI), non-randomised BACI, temporal, spatial, other
Other outcome influencesOther potential outcome influences mentioned in the study
Quantitative study quality ratingLow, high or not rated (based on study design rating)
Qualitative study quality ratingLow, medium and high
Additional detailsComments