Skip to main content

Table 3 Coding variables

From: Does the gender composition of forest and fishery management groups affect resource governance and conservation outcomes? A systematic map

Variable

Details/examples

ID

Unique ID for each article

Reviewer

 

First author

 

Year

 

Full reference

 

URL

 

Publication type

E.g., journal, book chapter, conference paper, thesis, organisation report

Article access issues

E.g., none, subscription only, author only

Biome

Forest, marine or freshwater

Study country/ies

 

Study region(s)

 

Study length

Time over which study undertaken

Study description

Short description of study

Project name

 

Intervention type (primary)

List of different forest and fish conservation and resource management interventions

Primary outcome (governance, conservation)

Short description of the primary outcome

Quantitative study design rating and type

Rating and type of study design on the five-point scale of the Maryland scientific methods scale

Qualitative study quality rating

Rating from 1 to 10 based on CASP qualitative research checklist

Method(s) of data collection

List of data collection method(s)

Sample size

Number in sample

Sample unit

E.g., individuals, households, groups

Comparator type

E.g., randomised before–after, control-impact (BACI), non-randomised BACI, temporal, spatial, other

Other outcome influences

Other potential outcome influences mentioned in the study

Quantitative study quality rating

Low, high or not rated (based on study design rating)

Qualitative study quality rating

Low, medium and high

Additional details

Comments