Skip to main content

Table 2 Five criteria used in quality assessment (61 studies)

From: China’s conversion of cropland to forest program: a systematic review of the environmental and socioeconomic effects

Quality criterion

Definition

Percentage of all papers meeting criteria (%)

1

Data collection methods are thoroughly explained, clear and replicable

68.9 (42 papers)

2

Sample size is well explained and representative of the population

54.1 (33 papers)

3

Qualitative or quantitative analysis methods are thoroughly explained, clear and replicable; key terms and variables are well defined

70.5 (43 papers)

4

Results/conclusions are logically derived and supported by presented evidence

80.3 (49 papers)

5

Confounding factors are considered and well explained

54.1 (33 papers)