Question/criterion | Yes | Partly | No | Unclear |
---|---|---|---|---|
Did the study have a temporal and/or spatial control? | BACI study | BA study or CI study | N/a (not eligible according to inclusion criteria) | Lacking sufficient information to judge |
Degree of replication appropriate and representative? (to outcome measure) | Replicated burns, OR a single large burn area, with samples considered to be representative and spatially independent | Single burn with limited sampling within burn | A single/small burn area with very limited sampling within burn | Lacking sufficient information to judge |
Does treatment allocation account for spatial heterogeneity? (e.g. blocked or randomised) and/or  intervention and comparator sites well-matched i.e. similar at baseline (e.g. aspect, soil type, forest type) | Treatment allocation (multiple burn) or replication (within a single burn) accounts for spatial heterogeneity i.e. appropriately randomised, randomised and blocked or stratified OR stated/clear attempt at matching OR highly likely to be similar | Spatial heterogeneity not fully accounted for i.e. partial randomisation/blocking/stratification OR Moderately matched | Purposive treatment allocation that clearly does not account for spatial heterogeneity AND/OR Do not match | Lacking sufficient information to judge |
No severely confounding factors present (factors likely to confound the effect of the intervention on outcome)? apart from those present at baseline (e.g. other interventions) | Confounding factors likely to be minimal, were minimised or lacking | Some confounders present, likely to have moderate impact on outcome | Subject to confounders with major impact on outcome (such that outcomes are not clearly the effect of the intervention) | Lacking sufficient information to judge |
Intervention was likely appropriately and realistically applied? | Typical of a prescribed burn in terms of temperature, area, low intensity/severity of burn, or described as a prescribed burn and likely to be a typical prescribed burn | Partly typical of a prescribed burn in one (or more) aspect/s but not in others | Not typical of a prescribed burn (e.g. inappropriate temperature, very high intensity/severity) | Lacking any information/description of burn |
Outcome measure method was appropriate? | A reliable or standard measurement method for the outcome, and at a seasonal, temporal and spatial scale that is likely to capture any impact of the intervention on the outcome | Outcome measure method was partly appropriate and reliable | Outcome measure method was not appropriate or reliable (due to method choice and/or poor analysis of the data) | Lacking sufficient information to judge |