Skip to main content

Table 4 Variables used in the data analysis. Excludes intensity of harvest, which was tested only for uneven-aged forests

From: What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review

Category

Variable

Description

First stage of analysis: At the forest management level (uneven-aged or even-aged)

 Publication bias

Effect size

 

 Effect modifiers related to study attributes

Country

 

Study year

 

Sampling method

 

Literature type

Academic or grey literature

 Comparator

Management type

Natural, young even-aged forest, mature even-aged forest or retention forest

Second stage of analysis: At comparator forest level

 Species attributes

Taxa

Taxa that had at least two studies per comparator were analysed

Habitat specialism

Forest dependent species, generalist, open habitat species, soil inhabiting species

 Forest attributes

Deadwood

Volume of deadwood

Uneven-aged management: Volume of deadwood in comparator forest when the comparator was young even-aged forest or retention; volume of deadwood in exposure forest when the comparator was mature even-aged or natural forest.

Even-aged management: Volume of deadwood in exposure forest in the case of all comparators

Years since harvest

How many years ago the forest was harvested

Uneven-aged: time since exposure forest was harvested was used when comparator was natural forest or mature even-aged forest; time since comparator forest was harvested was used when comparator was young even-aged forest or retention

Even-aged: time since exposure forest was harvested was used with all comparators