Table 8 Comparing other evidence syntheses to our current map. N.B
From: Existing evidence on the outcomes of wildlife translocations in protected areas: a systematic map
Citation | Scope of review | Nature of synthesis | Search databases | No. of other literature sources | Publication data range of included articles | No. of included publications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Our map (translocation synthesis) | P: all biodiversity worldwide I: reintroductions, introductions, Supplementations C: protected areas | Systematic map | 2 databases: WOS, SCOPUS | 12 (+2 grey literature calls) | 1969 to 2020 | 498 |
Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation. 2000; 96: 1–11 | P: animals worldwide I: reintroductions, supplementations, introductions | Map-like | 0 databases | A search for articles across 12 major journals only | 1979 to 1998 | 124 |
Hale SL, Koprowski JL. Ecosystem-level effects of keystone species reintroduction: a literature review. Restoration Ecology. 2018; 26: 439–45 | P: key-stone species I: reintroductions only | Map-like | 1 database: WOS | 0 | 1995 to 2016 | 69 |
Tetzlaff SJ, Sperry JH, DeGregorio BA. Effects of antipredator training, environmental enrichment, and soft release on wildlife translocations: a review and meta-analysis. Biol Cons. 2019; 236: 324–31 | P: all biodiversitya I: translocationsa C: antipredator training, soft release, or environmental Enrichment | Meta-analysis | 0 databases (Search in google scholar only) | 0 | 1981 to 2018 | 41 |
Resende, P., Viana-Junior, A., Young, R., Azevedo, C., 2020. A global review of animal translocation programs. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 221–232. https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2020.43.0221 | P: animals I: introduction, reintroduction, translocationsa | Map-like | 2 databases: WOS, SCOPUS | 1 | 1986 to 2017 | 145 |