Table 7 Data extraction fields and codes filled with example answers to be pre-coded
Category | Pre-coded options | Free text | |
|---|---|---|---|
Metadata of the study | Type of publication | Peerreviewed journal, Organisational report, Professional journal, Conference paper, Thesis | |
Study setup | Field experiment, Greenhouse experiment, Cold chamber, other | ||
Study design | Blocked randomised design, randomised design (blocked), blocked design, randomised design (splitplot), randomised design, factorial design, Latin square, split-plot design, strip-plot design, field-scale comparison (no replication within a field), paired design, purposive, other, NA, ND | ||
Variability measure | None, Unclear, Overall 95% CI, Overall CV, Overall LSD, Overall p values, Overall SE, Raw data, Overall SED, Individual CI, Individual 95% CI, Individual SD, Individual LSD, Individual SE, Individual p values, Individual SED | ||
Sample size | [number of spatial replicates per treatment] | ||
Number of observations per replication | [number of trees/ branches] | ||
Funding | Governmental, university, private sector, NGOs, foundations | ||
Country | List of temperate countries | ||
Longitude/latitude | [longitude and latitude retrieved from given address] | ||
Height above sea level | [m] | ||
Relief | Description | ||
Land use type (surroundings) | Description | ||
Dominant soil texture | Description | ||
Set-up | Intervention(s) | Description of intervention | |
Intervention class | Water, wind, foliar application, mechanic intervention, covering, heating | ||
Fruit | Apple, Pear, Cherry, Peach, Nectarine, Plum, Apricot, Avocado, Lemon, Orange, Grapefruit, Mandarine, Pomelo, Grapevine | ||
Cultivar | Variety name | ||
Rootstock | Rootstock name | ||
Development stage | [BBCH code or description] | ||
Pruning details | Any information given | ||
Distance between rows and trees | Meter x meter | ||
Field size | [m2] | ||
Planting year | Year(s) | ||
Measurement year | Year(s) | ||
Groundcover | Description | ||
Orientation of rows | North: South, East: West, North-East: South-West, North-West: South-East | ||
Temperature sensors position | On trees ≥ 2 m, On trees < 2 m, between trees ≥ 2 m, between trees < 2 m, off-field, in flowers, in greenhouse | ||
Conditions of effective-ness | Frost type—tested | Radiative, advective | |
Frost type—effective | Radiative, advective | ||
Details if applicable Timing, concentration, strength of inversion, discharge | |||
Wind speed (max) | In m/s | ||
Wind direction | |||
Relative humidity | In % | ||
Min. temp. recorded | [°C] | ||
Min. temp. effective | [°C] | ||
Length of frost period | [h] | ||
Results | Identified limitations | Description | |
Costs per ha (€) | [€ or volume of resources] | ||
Yield | [kg] | ||
Intervention | |||
Control | |||
Difference | |||
Flower/ bud damage | [%] | ||
Intervention | |||
Control | |||
Difference | |||
Bud break | [days] | ||
Difference in days | |||
Max. recorded temperature increase (intervention–control) | [°C] | ||
Effective measure | Yes, no |