PICO component | Include | Exclude |
---|---|---|
Populations or subjects | Any non-native aquatic habitat to which guppy fish were introduced and established | Native aquatic habitats, which are defined as those located in Trinidad, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, and Tobago [1] |
Intervention(s) or exposure(s) | Only anthropogenic exotic guppy fish introduction and their establishment | Introduction of non-guppy species, or non-anthropogenic guppy introduction, such as flooding |
Comparator(s) | Studies reporting before and after guppy introductions; experimental intervention-control studies; observational presence-absence studies | Aquatic habitats to which other exotic fish have been introduced |
Outcome | At least one of five different parameters, which reflect directly on faunal biodiversity impacts: (1) Abundance of individuals of any species (number of individuals, number of individuals per unit effort (or CUE), or pooled biomass); (2) Total abundance of individuals of all species present (number of individuals, number of individuals per unit effort (or CUE), or pooled biomass); (3) Species richness (number of species); (4) Species diversity (Shannon–Wiener or Simpson’s indices); and (5) Community evenness (Pielou’s index) | Any qualitative/narrative syntheses or quantitative outcomes that are not defined in the inclusion criteria (e.g., nutrient levels, indirect habitat conditions, and non-faunal alterations) |
Types of study design | All quantitative observational and experimental study designs which report complete primary quantitative data. Although meta-analysis, reviews, or maps will not be included in the list of sources, their references will be scanned and their primary sources will be included if they meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria | Qualitative/narrative syntheses Book reviews Websites and newspaper articles Social Media content Commentaries and opinion papers Policy type documents Protocols |
Language | English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Japanese | Â |