From: On-site communication measures as a tool in outdoor recreation management: a systematic map protocol
Item | Description |
---|---|
Title | Published title |
Year | Year of publication |
Date | Date of publication |
Jounal | Journal name |
DOI | Identification code if available |
Authors | Author’s records |
Abstract | Published summary text |
Behavior description(s) | Authors description of the behavior being targeted: |
Behavioral category | Give the study a category based on the wanted change in behavior (multiple categories can be applied to a single study, but only if it is mentioned by the authors) 1 = Disposing waste properly (e.g. ‘pack in pack out’ or dispose waste in trash cans) 2 = Channeling use (e.g. hiking on designated trails) 3 = Minimizing camping impacts (e.g. not damaging trees or use of designated camping and/or campfire areas) 4 = Respect wildlife (e.g. do not feed or disturb wildlife or maintain safe distance) 5 = Pay fees and comply with regulations (e.g. no collecting or harvesting of what and where it is not allowed, paying fishing license or paying for public goods such as toilets and shelters or paying a national park fee) 6 = Social impacts (e.g. show consideration to other visitors) 7 = Act according to safety measures (e.g. wear proper clothing or staying away from a place because of safety reasons) 8 = Other behavior |
Study content | Give the study a category based on setting: 1 = Experiment (experimental setting) 2 = Quasi-experiment (experimental, but more adapted to real life conditions) 3 = Observation (real life setting) |
Study experimental design | Give the study a category based on study design. Several can apply: 1 = Pre- and post-test used 2 = Using a control group |
Study measurement | Give the study a category based on how the behavioral change was measured (multiple categories can be applied to a single study) 1 = Observation of behavior 2 = Counter 3 = Big data 4 = GPS 5 = Interviews 6 = Focus groups 7 = Thematic qualitative 8 = Intercept survey 9 = Passive survey (e.g. online) 10 = Survey including qualitative components 11 = Assessments of impacts on nature (field survey) 12 = Other methods, explain: |
Study design comments | Describe the study design in more detail and what the methods described separately: |
Study period | State number of days the behavior was studied |
Sample size | Number of respondents—State number of people who got their behavior studied |
Targeted population | Stated population that is the focus of the behavior(s) (age, gender, local–regional-national, urban–rural etc.) |
Population category | Give the study a category based on focus population: 1 = Mostly locals 2 = Mostly residents within the country 3 = Mostly foreigners 4 = Mix of different visitors 5 = Not stated |
Country | State the country in which the study takes place: |
Geographical scope | Give the study a category for in what region it takes place: 1 = Europe 2 = US and Canada 3 = Latin America 4 = Asia 5 = Africa 6 = Oceania 7 = Not stated |
Environment setting category | Give the study a category for what setting/ecosystem it takes place: 1 = Forest 2 = Woodland-grassland (Bushland/savannah) 3 = Mountain 4 = Beach 5 = Freshwater (On Lake/river) 6 = Marine (Near/ on the ocean, coral reefs etc.) 7 = Park (open place in a city or town) 8 = Desert 9 = Other setting, please specify: 10 = Not stated |
Protected areas | Give the study a category if the study has taken place in a protected area: 2 = Taken place in a protected area 1 = Not taken place in a protected area, but similar setting and no big reasons for the results to change drastic if it was conducted in a protected area 0 = Different setting, behavior and/or population than what can appear in protected areas |
Protected area category | If the category above was rated 2 categorize protection according to IUCN: 1a = Strict Nature Reserve 1b = Wilderness Area 2 = National Park 3 = Natural Monument or Feature 4 = Habitat/Species Management Area 5 = Protected Landscape/Seascape 6 = Protected area with sustainable use of natural resources 7 = Not able to categorize |
Theory/framework | State the different communication theories/frameworks that have been used to develop the communication measure. If it cannot be found write 0: |
Theory/framework category (Stern 2018, see Table 3.1 p. 22–25 for theories under persuasive communication, p 27–70, p 84–120) | If not given 0 above, give the study a category for what theory/framework it has focused on (several categories can be given if applied): 1 = Norm theory (social norm, norm activation and value-belief-norm) 2 = Cognitive dissonance 3 = Elaboration Likelihood Model 4 = Theory of planned behavior 5 = Self-Determination Theory 6 = Extended Parallel Process Model of Fear Appeals 7 = Motivation Crowding Theory 8 = Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs 9 = Identity Theory 10 = Moral Foundations Theory 11 = Frame theory 12 = Meyer’s Culture Map 13 = Trust Theory 14 = Principled Negotiation 15 = Diffusion Theory 16 = Other |
Communication measures category | Give the study a category based on how the message was communicated: 1 = Written 2 = Oral |
Medium written category | If the category was rated 1 above give the study a category based on how the message was communicated (can be extended): 1 = Sign 2 = Poster (longer explanation than sign) 3 = Brochure 4 = Digital display 5 = Multimedia/infotainment |
Medium oral category | If the category was rated 2 above, give the study a category based on how the message was communicated (can be extended): 1 = Person 2 = Soundtrack 3 = multimedia/infotainment |
Message focus category Categories based on persuasive communication theories in Stern 2018, p. 27–70, p. 84–120 and topics focused on in Absher and Bright 2004, p. 117–126 and Heberlein 2012, structural fixes (norms p. 90–112) and cognitive fixes (attitudes, direct experience, identity p. 15–68) | Give the study one or more categories based on what the message is focusing on: 1 = Feelings/emotions (e.g. pride, fear, appreciation, responsibility) 2 = Education/knowledge (e.g. reliable evidence, certainty, give a solution/outcome, consequence, competence, remove barriers) 3 = Activating existing knowledge/experience (e.g. confirmatory thought, direct experience, prior knowledge) 4 = Feed-back (sign pledge, build personal relationships etc.) 5 = Identity (relatedness/relevance/meaningfulness, autonomy, freedom, not shamed about prior experience, important reference group/role models, cultural cognition) 6 = Social (e.g. relationship between people, status is social group, collective, pride, shame) 7 = Environment (sustainable development, climate, biodiversity etc.) 8 = Personal/local/ place-based message: connection between visitor and the site/resource, two-way dialogue 9 = Acknowledgement/reward/benefits 10 = Punishment/sanction/cost of action 11 = Experts/management (source of the message or backing it up, credibility, respect, trust) 13 = Provocation (personally reflection on content and its deeper meanings) 14 = Other, please explain: |
Confounding variables identified category | State if data was not in accordance with expectations: 1 = Yes (confounding variable) 2 = No |
Confounding variables description | If the category was rated 1, specify which one |
Reasons for unaltered behavior | Describe authors’ reasoning for observed unaltered behavior despite tested measures (e.g. context, if you do not have litter to toss), identity, cognitive dissonance, self-justification, undermining credibility, ability to process the message etc.) |