Skip to main content
Fig. 10 | Environmental Evidence

Fig. 10

From: Does the growing of Bt maize change abundance or ecological function of non-target animals compared to the growing of non-GM maize? A systematic review

Fig. 10

Meta-analyses on different taxonomic levels for untreated Bt and non-Bt maize (by critical appraisal level). Either all records (A), or only records with all critical appraisal criteria flagged “green” were included (B). All Bt proteins were included. For each taxon, the effect size estimate and the 95% confidence interval is given (negative effect sizes indicate lower populations in Bt compared with non-Bt maize and vice versa). Significant intervals (red) do not include 0. On the right side is the number of records (rec.), experiments (exp.), and articles (art.) included in each analysis. Het indicates significant (P < 0.05) heterogeneity. For details see Additional file 7: Table S7.4

Back to article page

Environmental Evidence

ISSN: 2047-2382