Skip to main content
Fig. 12 | Environmental Evidence

Fig. 12

From: Does the growing of Bt maize change abundance or ecological function of non-target animals compared to the growing of non-GM maize? A systematic review

Fig. 12

Meta-analyses on the influence of private sector contribution (private or public). The analyses examined all Bt proteins or only Lepidoptera-active, Coleoptera-active, or stacked Coleoptera- and Lepidoptera-active Bt proteins. Records with any red flag in the critical appraisal were excluded. For each analysis, the effect size estimate and the 95% confidence interval is given (negative effect sizes indicate lower populations in Bt compared with non-Bt maize and vice versa). Significant intervals (red) do not include 0. On the right side is the number of records (rec.), experiments (exp.), and articles (art.) included in each analysis. For details see Additional file 7: Table S7.7. Results of moderator analyses for individual Bt proteins (Additional file 7: Table S7.8) are indicated. ↓: lower values in Bt compared with non-Bt treatment (negative effect size), ↑: higher values (positive effect size), 0: no effect

Back to article page