Skip to main content

Table 2 Final search string with four blocks formatted for Web of Science Core Collection

From: To what extent does surrounding landscape explain stand-level occurrence of conservation-relevant species in fragmented boreal and hemi-boreal forest?–a systematic review protocol

Block

Terms

1. Population

ALL = ((forest* OR wood* OR deadwood* OR dead-wood*) AND (boreal* OR boreonemoral OR hemiboreal OR hemi-boreal OR taiga OR Sweden OR Finland OR Fennoscandia OR Norway OR Canada OR Alaska OR Estonia OR Russia OR Scotland OR Iceland OR Mongolia OR Japan OR Siberia OR Latvia OR Lithuania OR Maine OR Minnesota OR Belarus)) AND

2. Exposure/Comparator – Landscape scale

TS = (landscape* OR region* OR spatial OR provinc* OR ‘‘large-scale’’ OR surrounding OR fragment* OR matrix) AND

3. Exposure/Comparator – Fragmentation

TS = (fragment* OR continu* OR connectivity OR isolate* OR ‘‘habitat loss’’ OR woodlot* OR ‘‘forest stand*’’ OR metapopulation OR ‘‘habitat patch*’’ OR configuration OR ‘‘old-growth forest*’’ OR ‘‘woodland key habitat*’’ OR ‘‘management histor*’’ OR ‘‘land-use histor*’’ OR ‘‘land use histor*‘‘ OR ’’historic* ‘‘land use’’) AND

4. Outcomes

TS = (biodiversity OR ‘‘species richness’’ OR distribution OR abundan* OR occurrence OR composition OR extinction* OR diversity OR densit* OR cover OR coloni*ation* OR occupancy OR dispersal OR community OR viab* OR ‘‘population trend*’’ OR activity OR ‘‘species turnover’’ OR nesting OR incidence OR ‘‘genetic diversity’’ OR ‘‘genetic structur*’’ OR ‘‘isolation by distance’’ OR ‘‘isolation-by-distance’’)