Fig. 5From: Synthesising results of meta-analyses to inform policy: a comparison of fast-track methodsFactors explaining the coverage of confidence intervals obtained with the methods SOMA (A) and MAMA (B), and explaining the bias of MAMA (C). The red dashed lines indicate the target optimal value (0.95) of the confidence interval (A, B), and zero bias (C). The p values indicate the significance of the relationships. Results obtained with simulated dataBack to article page