Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Correction to: Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools

Contributed equally
Environmental EvidenceThe official journal of the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence20187:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0124-4

Received: 26 February 2018

Accepted: 15 March 2018

Published: 27 March 2018

The original article was published in Environmental Evidence 2018 7:8

Correction to: Environ Evid (2018) 7:8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0115-5

The authors wish to update information about the software DistillerSR in Tables 1 and 3 which we were alerted to following the publication of original article [1]. In addition to the analysis provided, DistillerSR does support protocol development (Pi) e.g. assistance to determine appropriate PICO elements, and critical appraisal (Cr) as ‘stages of the SR process supported’. This information was not originally included in the assessment due to a lack of clarity on the service providers’ website. No further updates to this manuscript will be possible for this or other software, in line with the general disclaimer below.

General disclaimer:

The review of systematic review support software represents an independent assessment by EJ McIntosh based on publicly available information on each software package. This assessment represents an attempt to best capture information located via service providers’ websites, in academic publications, user manuals and via free trials or software demonstrations. Occasionally, relevant information was not publicly available or may have been difficult to access or interpret. This assessment does not represent the views or opinions of any of the software developers or service providers. The review of software was completed in mid-2017, readers should visit the software providers’ websites (linked in Table 1) to check for updates, for further information and to seek clarification where necessary.

Notes

Declarations

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Quedlinburg, Germany
(2)
School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
(3)
Mistra EviEM, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Reference

  1. Kohl C, McIntosh EJ, Unger S, Haddaway NR, Kecke S, Schiemann J, Wilhelm R. Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools. Environ Evid. 2018;7:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0115-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement